The University of Alabama returned a $21.5 million donation after the donor attempted to influence the law school regarding scholarships, hiring and firing, student admissions, and other aspects of the school.
Hugh Culverhouse, the donor who gave the university the mass sum, attempted to paint a different picture of why the money was returned. In an op-ed for The Washington Post, he argued “I gave the University of Alabama $26.5 million. They gave it back when I spoke out about abortion."
At the time of initial publication of this article on Tuesday, the Post's op-ed still stated that Culverhouse's donation was refunded because of the donor's abortion statements, despite the university releasing the emails on Monday.
“It has been painful to witness administrators at the university choose zealotry over the well-being of its own students, but it’s another example of the damage this attack on abortion rights will do to Alabama,” Culverhouse wrote in the op-ed.
Following the Friday publication of the op-ed, the University of Alabama released a set of emails between prominent university figures and Culverhouse, showing that the decision to return the money was not because of politics, but rather because of the influence Culverhouse tried to exert over the law school.
[RELATED: Jeff Bezos donates $33 million for DACA scholarships]
“Our decision was never about the issue of abortion,” the university system said in a statement. “It was always about ending the continued outside interference by the donor in the operations of The University of Alabama School of Law.”
According to AL.com, the University of Alabama Board of Trustees voted June 7 to give back the $21.5 million that Culverhouse had so far donated, $5 million short of the $26.5 million he had originally pledged.
Emails released by UA show that Culverhouse attempted to influence hiring and operations at the university.
In an email chain to Stuart Bell, president of the University of Alabama, wherein the donor asked for the return of $10 million of his donation, Culverhouse expressed his disdain toward the current law school dean, Mark Brandon.
“I wanted a renowned Constitutional law professor,” the donor said. “Someone to make academic waves...These are nice additions to a 3880 faculty with an insecure dean-but they are hardly nationally stature constitutional law figures.&
Read more: https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=13317